Discussion:
[teampractices] No questions allowed!
Kevin Smith
2017-10-12 20:01:33 UTC
Permalink
Last weekend, I had a dream, and this email is about that dream.

I had just started working at an organization, as an Agile Coach (or
similar). I was surprised to learn that one of their important rules was
that everyone was prohibited from asking questions.

Since a HUGE part of being an agile coach is asking questions, this seemed
insane to me. While trying to do my work, I kept starting to ask a
question, and then thinking through how to convey my point in a different
way.

I pushed back, and asked why this rule was in place. The explanation
(remember this was a dream, so it doesn't have to be entirely coherent) was
something along the lines of: It's unfair for you to expect someone to
answer YOUR questions, because it makes assumptions about their goals and
interests. It puts them in a position of "answering to" you.

As I continued to work within this odd framework, it became less
uncomfortable. There were cases where it was actually helpful, especially
since I sometimes have difficulty expressing my own preferences. Instead of
"What should we do next?", I might say "I think we should do X next". It
prevented people from using questions in a passive-aggressive way (which
can happen). And some people who were used to *only* speaking up when asked
a question found themselves force to speak up without prompting.

For the rest of the night, even as I was in other, unrelated dreams, this
idea of "no questions" kept returning. By the end of the night, I felt
mostly at peace with it.

I'm not advocating that we adopt this policy. But I encourage you to take a
few minutes and reflect how different your work life would be if you
weren't allowed to ask questions. For me at least, it was an interesting
thought experiment.


Kevin Smith
Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Marti Johnson
2017-10-12 20:13:35 UTC
Permalink
This is such an awesome list. I love getting a colleague's dream
description in my work inbox! Thank you, Kevin!




*Marti JohnsonProgram Officer*
*Individual Grants*
*Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home>*
+1 415-839-6885
Skype: Mjohnson_WMF

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it
a reality!
Support Wikimedia <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
Post by Kevin Smith
Last weekend, I had a dream, and this email is about that dream.
I had just started working at an organization, as an Agile Coach (or
similar). I was surprised to learn that one of their important rules was
that everyone was prohibited from asking questions.
Since a HUGE part of being an agile coach is asking questions, this seemed
insane to me. While trying to do my work, I kept starting to ask a
question, and then thinking through how to convey my point in a different
way.
I pushed back, and asked why this rule was in place. The explanation
(remember this was a dream, so it doesn't have to be entirely coherent) was
something along the lines of: It's unfair for you to expect someone to
answer YOUR questions, because it makes assumptions about their goals and
interests. It puts them in a position of "answering to" you.
As I continued to work within this odd framework, it became less
uncomfortable. There were cases where it was actually helpful, especially
since I sometimes have difficulty expressing my own preferences. Instead of
"What should we do next?", I might say "I think we should do X next". It
prevented people from using questions in a passive-aggressive way (which
can happen). And some people who were used to *only* speaking up when asked
a question found themselves force to speak up without prompting.
For the rest of the night, even as I was in other, unrelated dreams, this
idea of "no questions" kept returning. By the end of the night, I felt
mostly at peace with it.
I'm not advocating that we adopt this policy. But I encourage you to take
a few minutes and reflect how different your work life would be if you
weren't allowed to ask questions. For me at least, it was an interesting
thought experiment.
Kevin Smith
Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
teampractices mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
Jeroen De Dauw
2017-10-13 00:30:10 UTC
Permalink
Hey,

Thanks for sharing.

It seems like for such a policy to not result in disaster, everyone needs a
good amount of empathy and willingness to cooperate. If you have an opinion
and person B has another opinion, person B cannot rely on you asking them
why they have this differing opinion in case where you want to know.
Instead they have to figure it out for themselves. At least assuming you
can't say something like "I wonder why you think that" or "Tell me why",
which while strictly are not questions, result in the "same" interaction
(different tone though).

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw | https://entropywins.wtf | https://keybase.io/jeroendedauw
Software craftsmanship advocate | Developer at Wikimedia Germany
~=[,,_,,]:3
Post by Marti Johnson
This is such an awesome list. I love getting a colleague's dream
description in my work inbox! Thank you, Kevin!
*Marti JohnsonProgram Officer*
*Individual Grants*
*Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home>*
+1 415-839-6885
Skype: Mjohnson_WMF
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
http://youtu.be/ci0Pihl2zXY in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make
it a reality!
Support Wikimedia <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
Post by Kevin Smith
Last weekend, I had a dream, and this email is about that dream.
I had just started working at an organization, as an Agile Coach (or
similar). I was surprised to learn that one of their important rules was
that everyone was prohibited from asking questions.
Since a HUGE part of being an agile coach is asking questions, this
seemed insane to me. While trying to do my work, I kept starting to ask a
question, and then thinking through how to convey my point in a different
way.
I pushed back, and asked why this rule was in place. The explanation
(remember this was a dream, so it doesn't have to be entirely coherent) was
something along the lines of: It's unfair for you to expect someone to
answer YOUR questions, because it makes assumptions about their goals and
interests. It puts them in a position of "answering to" you.
As I continued to work within this odd framework, it became less
uncomfortable. There were cases where it was actually helpful, especially
since I sometimes have difficulty expressing my own preferences. Instead of
"What should we do next?", I might say "I think we should do X next". It
prevented people from using questions in a passive-aggressive way (which
can happen). And some people who were used to *only* speaking up when asked
a question found themselves force to speak up without prompting.
For the rest of the night, even as I was in other, unrelated dreams, this
idea of "no questions" kept returning. By the end of the night, I felt
mostly at peace with it.
I'm not advocating that we adopt this policy. But I encourage you to take
a few minutes and reflect how different your work life would be if you
weren't allowed to ask questions. For me at least, it was an interesting
thought experiment.
Kevin Smith
Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
teampractices mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
_______________________________________________
teampractices mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
Kevin Smith
2017-10-13 20:34:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
It seems like for such a policy to not result in disaster, everyone needs
a good amount of empathy and willingness to cooperate.
​Agreed! It would probably also require everyone to have strong
communication skills, generally.
​
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
At least assuming you can't say something like "I wonder why you think
that" or "Tell me why", which while strictly are not questions, result in
the "same" interaction (different tone though).
​Right. I didn't work at Dreamcorp long enough to find out whether it was
ok to exploit the loopholes. :)

There is an interesting difference between "What do you think we should
do?" and "I would appreciate if you could tell me what you think we should
do." Although the latter is more verbose, it actually ends up using an "I
statement"[1], as well as expressing appreciation at the same time. "It
would help me if you could..." would also work, as it empowers the other
person to provide you with help. ​On the other hand, "Tell me what you
think we should do" is a command, and I'm not fond of it.

"Why do you think that's best?" could become "I'm concerned about X", or "I
really thought we should do Y". Both of which would be more helpful in some
cases, but less helpful in others. Often, an open-ended question can
inspire people to address things you weren't thinking of, and can avoid you
biasing their response. But sometimes giving a framework can be helpful.

Thanks for helping me thing these things through even deeper.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-message
Kevin Smith
2017-10-13 20:40:12 UTC
Permalink
Oh, also:

"What did you mean by X?" could become "I don't understand X". Which again
is better in some ways but worse in others.



Kevin Smith
Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Post by Kevin Smith
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
It seems like for such a policy to not result in disaster, everyone needs
a good amount of empathy and willingness to cooperate.
​Agreed! It would probably also require everyone to have strong
communication skills, generally.
​
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
At least assuming you can't say something like "I wonder why you think
that" or "Tell me why", which while strictly are not questions, result in
the "same" interaction (different tone though).
​Right. I didn't work at Dreamcorp long enough to find out whether it was
ok to exploit the loopholes. :)
There is an interesting difference between "What do you think we should
do?" and "I would appreciate if you could tell me what you think we should
do." Although the latter is more verbose, it actually ends up using an "I
statement"[1], as well as expressing appreciation at the same time. "It
would help me if you could..." would also work, as it empowers the other
person to provide you with help. ​On the other hand, "Tell me what you
think we should do" is a command, and I'm not fond of it.
"Why do you think that's best?" could become "I'm concerned about X", or
"I really thought we should do Y". Both of which would be more helpful in
some cases, but less helpful in others. Often, an open-ended question can
inspire people to address things you weren't thinking of, and can avoid you
biasing their response. But sometimes giving a framework can be helpful.
Thanks for helping me thing these things through even deeper.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-message
Marti Johnson
2017-10-13 22:54:49 UTC
Permalink
In the NVC trainings that I've been doing, it is often stressed that
authentic self expression is more vulnerable than listening, because the
speaker is exposing themselves while the listener remains relatively
hidden. Obviously, the manner of expression makes all the difference--one
could easily be invulnerably talking-at someone and remain quite hidden.
But assuming that the speaker is showing up fully, with
self-responsibility, then the teaching, in relation to power dynamics, is
that the person in power should generally be the first one to speak (with
lots of caveats and exceptions), making themselves vulnerable first and
creating more equality of power.

I thought of this teaching when I read the dream. In certain contexts,
being questioned by someone (especially by someone with more power) can
feel like facing a firing a squad--with one's vulnerability forcibly on
display, without mutuality and with insufficient regard for safety. In
that kind of atmosphere, it could feel safer if no questions were allowed.
It could be a way to prioritize individual choice around self expression.

I think it's interesting to think about what makes a culture safe for
questions. One of the things that occurs to me is that the environment
must genuinely support choice about how and whether to answer--a sense that
anyone can decline to answer, that an authentic no is not only allowable
but desirable--preferred over a cowed yes, etc.




*Marti JohnsonProgram Officer*
*Individual Grants*
*Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home>*
+1 415-839-6885
Skype: Mjohnson_WMF

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
http://youtu.be/ci0Pihl2zXY in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it
a reality!
Support Wikimedia <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
Post by Kevin Smith
"What did you mean by X?" could become "I don't understand X". Which again
is better in some ways but worse in others.
Kevin Smith
Engineering Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Post by Kevin Smith
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
It seems like for such a policy to not result in disaster, everyone
needs a good amount of empathy and willingness to cooperate.
​Agreed! It would probably also require everyone to have strong
communication skills, generally.
​
Post by Jeroen De Dauw
At least assuming you can't say something like "I wonder why you think
that" or "Tell me why", which while strictly are not questions, result in
the "same" interaction (different tone though).
​Right. I didn't work at Dreamcorp long enough to find out whether it was
ok to exploit the loopholes. :)
There is an interesting difference between "What do you think we should
do?" and "I would appreciate if you could tell me what you think we should
do." Although the latter is more verbose, it actually ends up using an "I
statement"[1], as well as expressing appreciation at the same time. "It
would help me if you could..." would also work, as it empowers the other
person to provide you with help. ​On the other hand, "Tell me what you
think we should do" is a command, and I'm not fond of it.
"Why do you think that's best?" could become "I'm concerned about X", or
"I really thought we should do Y". Both of which would be more helpful in
some cases, but less helpful in others. Often, an open-ended question can
inspire people to address things you weren't thinking of, and can avoid you
biasing their response. But sometimes giving a framework can be helpful.
Thanks for helping me thing these things through even deeper.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-message
_______________________________________________
teampractices mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
Loading...